MREAT directs Piramal Estate to pay back buyers’ money after ‘medical emergency’ – ET Realty

MREAT directs Piramal Estate to pay back buyers’ money after ‘medical emergency’ – ET Realty

MREAT, while hearing an appeal against a MahaRERA order of October 3, 2019, directed Piramal Estate Pvt Ltd to pay a Thane couple Rs 5.6 lakh, which they had paid in 2019 towards cost of a flat in Vaikunth cluster in Thane.

 

MUMBAI: Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT), in a recent judgment, stated that the home-buyers’ right to make a request for reservation of flat includes right to withdraw such a request for reservation of flat.

MREAT, while hearing an appeal against a MahaRERA order of October 3, 2019, directed Piramal Estate Pvt Ltd to pay a Thane couple Rs 5.6 lakh, which they had paid in 2019 towards cost of a flat in Vaikunth cluster in Thane. The couple canceled the booking in May and sought a refund due to a medical emergency.

While stating that MahaRERA had passed the impugned order without proper application of mind and without correct appreciation of facts, MREAT members Sumant Kolhe and SS Sandhu observed that the clauses, relating to forfeiture of 10% of the price of flat or amount paid till date whichever is lesser in case of withdrawal, in the request for reservation form was an unreasonable, unfair and one-sided condition, and was against the object and purpose of RERA.

MREAT members also observed that though this claim of refund was not governed by any specific provision of RERA, it cannot be ignored that the objective of RERA was to protect interests of consumers.

Dinesh and Ranjana Humane, represented by advocate Sunil Kewalramani, submitted a form of “request for reservation of flat” on January 29, 2019, and booked a flat in Vaikunth Cluster project, paying more than Rs 1 lakh. They also paid nearly Rs 4.5 lakh on March 1, 2019, towards price of the flat. But due to a medical emergency in the family, they decided to cancel the booking. They requested the promoter to refund Rs 5.6 lakh. But the promoter claimed the amount had been forfeited on account of cancellation, as per clause 17 of form of request for reservation.

MREAT observed that the forfeiture clause and clause that allottees had no right to withdraw their request for reservation, was unfair, unreasonable, one-sided and inequitable, and home-buyers cannot be restrained from exercising their right of withdrawing from the project. MREAT also pointed out that such unreasonable and unfair transactions cannot be enforced.

The promoter, represented by advocate Abir Patel, argued that allottees claimed relief on the basis of clause 18 of ‘model agreement’ for sale, as given under rules of RERA. Patel also claimed there was no violation of provisions of RERA or rules and regulations and the clause of forfeiture was given in model agreement under RERA rules and was not against its spirit.

For more details click the below link : realty.economictimes.indiatimes.com/…/mreat

13 thoughts on “MREAT directs Piramal Estate to pay back buyers’ money after ‘medical emergency’ – ET Realty

  1. stornobrzinol says:

    Thanks for sharing superb informations. Your web-site is so cool. I’m impressed by the details that you?¦ve on this blog. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched everywhere and just couldn’t come across. What a perfect web site.

  2. Pingback: latest on hydroxychloroquine treatment

  3. Donald White says:

    Hi, I do believe this is an excellent site.

    I stumbledupon it 😉 I will revisit once again since I book-marked it.
    Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide others.

  4. Sherry Patel says:

    It’s the best time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be
    happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you some interesting things or
    advice. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I desire to read even more things about it!

  5. Martha Strand says:

    Howdy would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re using?
    I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different web browsers and I must say this blog loads
    a lot faster then most. Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a reasonable price?
    Many thanks, I appreciate it!

  6. Jack Parker says:

    Hey there! I’ve been following your weblog for a while now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from New Caney Texas!
    Just wanted to mention keep up the excellent work!

  7. Chris Gee says:

    Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this blog.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s tough to get that
    “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual appearance.
    I must say you have done a fantastic job with this.
    Also, the blog loads super fast for me on Safari. Outstanding Blog!

  8. Robert Jeong says:

    I’m really impressed with your writing talents
    as smartly as with the layout on your blog.
    Is that this a paid topic or did you modify it yourself?
    Either way stay up the excellent high quality writing, it’s
    uncommon to peer a great weblog like this one nowadays..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Compare